Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja dan Stres Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Dosen di Tangerang Selatan
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to examine the influence of work environment and job stress on the work productivity of lecturers in South Tangerang. The method used in this research is a quantitative method with a descriptive approach. The population of this study includes all lecturers working in higher education institutions in South Tangerang, with a sample determined using the saturation sampling technique. A total of 100 lecturers from several higher education institutions in South Tangerang were taken as samples in this study. Data were collected through observation, questionnaires, interviews, and documentation, then analyzed using multiple linear regression. The results show that the work environment and job stress have a significant effect on lecturers' work productivity. The coefficient of determination (R Square) of 0.825 indicates that 82.5% of the variation in lecturers' work productivity can be explained by the variables of work environment and job stress. A good work environment, including adequate physical facilities, positive interpersonal relationships, a supportive work culture, and effective administrative support, as well as good stress management, can increase lecturers' productivity. These findings provide recommendations for educational institution managers to create a conducive work environment and effective stress management strategies to enhance lecturers' productivity.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Asi, L. L., & Gani, A. (2021). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Motivasi Kerja, Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Komitmen Organisasional Dan Kinerja Dosen Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. Journal of Management Science (JMS), 2(1), 01-24.
Awaluddin, M. (2016). Pengaruh budaya organisasi, kepuasan dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja dosen uin alauddin makassar. Assets: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 6(1), 116-125.
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Tangerang Selatan. (2023). Statistik Pendidikan Tangerang Selatan. Tangerang Selatan: BPS.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Baron, R. A., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Colquitt, J. A., Lepine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2015). Organizational Behavior: Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Greenberg, J., & Baron, R. A. (2013). Behavior in Organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The Motivation to Work. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Hidayat, T., & Purnamasari, L. (2023). Manajemen Stres Kerja di Kalangan Dosen. Jurnal Psikologi Terapan, 15(1), 78-92.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Indrasari, M., Syamsudin, N., Purnomo, B. R., & Yunus, E. (2018). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Lingkungan Kerja, Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Serta Dampaknya Terhadap Kinerja Dosen. Akademika Jurnal Manajemen, Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 16(1), 51-59.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2023). Data Statistik Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kemdikbudristek.
Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi (Kemenristekdikti). (2023). Laporan Kinerja Institusi Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta: Kemenristekdikti.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.
Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational Behavior: An Evidence-Based Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). The Truth About Burnout: How Organizations Cause Personal Stress and What to Do About It. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mutttaqijn, M. I. (2021). Pengaruh Disiplin Kerja Dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Dosen. JMB: Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 10(1).
Pangarso, A., & Ramadhyanti, V. (2015). Pengaruh lingkungan kerja non fisik terhadap kepuasan kerja Dosen tetap studi pada fakultas komunikasi dan Bisnis Universitas Telkom Bandung. Kinerja, 19(2), 174-193.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539-569.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Simarmata, R. M. (2020). Pengaruh work from home terhadap produktivitas dosen Politeknik Negeri Ambon. Jurnal Ekonomi, Sosial & Humaniora, 2(01), 73-82.
Subagyo, A. (2014). Pengaruh lingkungan kerja dan self efficacy terhadap komitmen organisasional dosen Politeknik Negeri Semarang. Orbith: Majalah Ilmiah Pengembangan Rekayasa Dan Sosial, 10(1).
Sugiyono. (2019). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Wahyuningsih, S. (2018). Pengaruh lingkungan kerja terhadap produktivitas kerja. Warta Dharmawangsa, (57).