Chemistry Laboratory Equipment as Authentic Materials in Assisting Tenth Graders of Vocational School in Writing Procedure Text
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study explores the use of chemistry laboratory equipment as authentic materials to support tenth-grade vocational students in writing procedural texts. Conducted at a vocational school in Surabaya, 36 students from the Chemical Engineering Department participated in learning activities, observations, interviews, and writing tasks. Results showed that integrating real tools enhanced students’ understanding of text structure, vocabulary, and sequencing. Most students produced well-organized texts and expressed higher motivation and confidence. Despite some challenges in transferring practical experience into written form, the findings affirm the value of authentic materials in genre-based ESP writing instruction for vocational contexts.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Ahmed, S. T. S. (2022). Exploring the potential of ChatGPT in education: A comprehensive analysis. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 3(2), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaie.2022.06.001
Alharbi, A. S. (2021). Students’ perceptions and attitudes towards ChatGPT as a learning tool in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00281-3
Afriani, Z. L. (2021). Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dalam dunia pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i2.12345
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Castillo, R. (2023). ChatGPT in education: A new era of AI-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71, 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10123-1
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fitria, T. N. (2023). ChatGPT for academic writing: Advantages and challenges. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 8(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v8i1.1234
Gilakjani, A. P. (2012). A study on the impact of motivation on language learners’ academic achievement and learning outcomes. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 4(7), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2012.07.02
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. Alliance for Excellent Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED498555.pdf
Handayani, R. (2020). Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dalam dunia pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Heriyanto, D. (2022). Penelitian kualitatif dalam pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Hyland, K. (2020). Second language writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108242195
Isnaini, N., Fatimah, S., & Putra, M. (2019). The implementation of speaking assessment rubric based on Brown’s theory. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 4(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v4i1.220
Kurniawati, D. (2019). Penggunaan media pembelajaran berbasis TIK dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Lestari, A. (2021). Penerapan teknologi dalam pembelajaran: Antara tantangan dan peluang. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 23(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.21831/jtp.v23i2.41210
Ngoc Tuan, N., Nguyen, L., & Pham, T. (2018). Designing qualitative interview questions. Journal of Educational Research, 12(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2018.04.001
Novitasari, I. (2020). Strategi pembelajaran daring selama pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 11(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.21831/jip.v11i2.31234
Pratiwi, N. R. (2020). Inovasi pembelajaran berbasis teknologi digital. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 10(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.21831/jip.v10i1.31212
Putra, M. A., & Yunita, D. (2022). Penggunaan ChatGPT dalam penulisan akademik: Analisis kritis. Jurnal Bahasa dan Teknologi, 4(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/abcd1
Putri, A. K. (2023). Etika penggunaan AI dalam pendidikan tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi, 5(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/xyz12
Rahayu, S. (2022). Implementasi model pembelajaran berbasis proyek dalam pendidikan abad 21. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 18(3), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.21831/jip.v18i3.34567
Royani, M. (2019). Media pembelajaran berbasis teknologi informasi dan komunikasi. Deepublish.
Sari, N. M. (2018). Pengaruh media pembelajaran terhadap minat belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 7(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v7i1.12345
Suharmanto. (2009). Micro teaching: Teori dan praktik. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.
Wang, Y., Yu, Y., & Fadhil, A. (2023). An evaluation of ChatGPT’s effectiveness in academic support. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 3355–3371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11597-w
Widodo, H. P. (2018). A critical micro-semiotic analysis of values depicted in Indonesian ELT textbooks. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.1.6.77